ofapis vs OFAuth
The ofapis vs OFAuth choice comes down to this: both help developers work with OnlyFans programmatically, but they solve different halves of the problem. OFAuth concentrates on the connection layer; ofapis is a full workflow API. This is an honest, criteria-based comparison — check each provider's site for current pricing and specifics before deciding.
The short version
- OFAuth positions itself as an SDK-first, auth-focused layer — often described as "Plaid for OnlyFans," with usage-based pricing. Strong if your main need is connecting accounts cleanly and you will build the rest of the workflow yourself.
- ofapis is a full metered REST surface: messaging, mailings, scheduling, fan segments, vault and profile data, plus signed webhooks and a credit model where failed calls aren't charged.
Side by side
| Criterion | ofapis | OFAuth |
|---|---|---|
| Primary focus | Full workflow REST API | Account connection / auth layer |
| Auth model | Bearer token; account connected once, session kept alive | SDK-driven account connection |
| Surface after auth | Messaging, mass DM, scheduling, segments, vault, profile | You build workflow calls on top |
| Webhooks | HMAC-signed, with delivery health | Verify on their site |
| Pricing model | Per successful call (credits), free tier | Usage-based; verify on their site |
| OpenAPI / SDK | OpenAPI 3.0 spec, live playground, MCP-ready | SDK-first |
| Account safety | Encrypted sessions, dedicated proxy per account | Verify on their site |
Cells marked "verify on their site" are deliberately not quoted here — those figures change, and a stale table is worse than none.
Where ofapis is strong
- Breadth of workflow endpoints, not just auth — see the messaging, mass DM, scheduling and subscribers APIs.
- Webhooks (HMAC-signed) with delivery health, so you can react to events instead of polling.
- AI-native: the OpenAPI spec feeds MCP / GPT Actions directly.
- Cost-safe metering: one credit per successful call, no charge on upstream failure, idempotency keys. See pricing.
When to choose OFAuth
If your project is primarily about account connection and you want a dedicated auth SDK with fine control over the sign-in flow, evaluate OFAuth directly. Some teams pair an auth layer with a broader workflow API rather than picking one — the two are not mutually exclusive.
When to choose ofapis
You want one Bearer token and one REST surface covering the whole creator workflow — connect the account once, then read chats, send mailings, schedule posts and receive signed events — with predictable metered pricing. Start free — 250 credits, no card.
FAQ
Are the numbers on this page guaranteed?
No — provider features and pricing change, so verify current details on each provider's own site. This page deliberately avoids quoting volatile figures and compares on stable criteria instead.
Is OFAuth a full OnlyFans API or just authentication?
OFAuth emphasises the authentication and account-connection layer. If you need messaging, mailings, scheduling and segmentation out of the box, a full workflow API like ofapis covers that surface directly.
Can I use an auth layer and ofapis together?
Yes — the patterns aren't exclusive. That said, ofapis connects an account once and keeps its session alive on its own, so for most integrations you won't need a separate auth layer.
Does ofapis charge for failed connection attempts?
No. Only successful API calls are metered as credits; expired sessions and upstream errors return an error status and cost nothing.
See also: how to compare OnlyFans APIs · alternatives